Waiting for a Sign: As National Weather Service Issues Tornado Advisory, a Minority of Senators Continue to Wait for a Sign Proving the Urgency of Climate Change
There is an oft-told joke about a man in the midst of a great flood. [for those who have heard this before, feel free to skip to the next paragraph] All about him, people are fleeing the town in droves; however, the pious man refuses assistance. A jeep drives by and invites him to "hop on board." The man declines, explaining, "I have faith that G-d will save me." Unable to change his mind, the jeep drives on. A bit later, as the flood-waters rise, a rescue team drifts by the man's house in a boat. "Hop in," the captain exclaims. "Don't worry about me," the man retorts, "I have faith that G-d will save me." Unable to change his mind, the rescue team floats by. A bit later, the flood engulfs the man's house, leaving him to hang from the chimney for safety. A crew in a helicopter spots him and offers a ladder and a lift. The man declines yet again, declaring with confidence that G-d will save him. The helicopter continues without him. Eventually, the man drowns and he enters heaven. Dismayed, he approaches G-d and exclaims, "You really let me down! I had faith that you would save me and look what happened!" "Who do you think sent you a jeep, a boat and a helicopter," G-d replies?
Though told in jest, the joke teaches a valuable lesson. We cannot be so blinded by our political agenda that we ignore the signs in front of our eyes. Two weeks ago, the U.S. Senate began a historic climate debate. As I wrote on the eve of that debate, "simply forcing a national discussion about climate change is a victory." In many respects, the climate vote was an extraordinary success. Forty-eight senators voted to move to substantive discussion on the bill. Six others submitted statements to the record indicating that they likewise supported continued debate. Combined, a comfortable majority in the Senate thus supports aggressive federal action on climate change. And, as the Union of Concerned Scientists reports, many of those who voted in favor of such action had previously opposed such initiatives – even though the legislation at issue was stronger than bills the Senate has considered in the past. Fortunately, as Senator Boxer explained, "We [now] have a road map as to where our colleagues are. We will give the road map to the next president so he knows where our colleagues are and where are the consensus areas and where are the difficult areas."
Yet, despite these accomplishments, the climate debate was, in other respects, a tragic missed opportunity. Like the man waiting on his roof for divine intervention, many members of the Senate seem to be awaiting an intangible sign from above – ignoring the signs that G-d has already sent to Earth. On the second morning of the climate debate, opponents insisted that they were not familiar with the bill due to a handful of technical changes that had been made in its final hours. In a move witnessed but once a decade, they insisted that the clerk read the bill – all 492 pages of it – on the Senate floor. For most of the day – more than eight hours – the clerk droned on, reading of offsets and auctions, allocations and subsidies.
And then G-d intervened.
At mid-day, thunderclouds descended over Washington, D.C. The sky darkened and rain pummeled the Capitol. I approached the building amid announcements of a "severe thunderstorm warning" on the Senate intercom system. The National Weather Service declared a tornado watch with wind gusts of up to 70 mph, admonishing citizens to "take cover" and "move to a safe place" to avoid flash floods. My home outside the Nation's Capitol lost power for two days.
A tornado warning is disconcerting in and of itself. But its impact is all the more dramatic when viewed in this context. As Senator Reid (D-NV) explained on the Senate floor, 2008 is on track to be "the deadliest year in the history of tornado deaths" in the United States. Since January, more than 110 people have lost their lives due to tornadoes – compared to an annual average of 62. I don't imply that a single tornado season confirms climate change, but it certainly doesn't suggest that we're heading in the right direction either. And, if an anomalous tornado season weren't warning enough, G-d has sent a steady succession of reinforcements – in the form of flooding in the Midwest, a drought in California, and a heat wave on the east coast.
NRDC policy director, David Doniger highlighted the curious coincidence of the climate debate and the tornado advisory in his blog. In it, he challenged readers to "draw [their] own conclusions." As I heard the weather advisory on the afternoon of the climate debate, I had only one thought: the bureaucracy of the political process had gone on long enough. As thunder crashed from the heavens, G-d had sounded a wake-up alarm for 100 Senators on Capitol Hill. "Do something," He implored. "Assume your role as my partner in creation, and help me to repair the world." The next morning, 54 of them heeded that warning and voted to proceed to the debate. Unfortunately, 46 others are still waiting on their rooftops for a sign…








yes, there have been many signs recently that reinforce my view that the world is heading toward an unprecedented catastrophe, including the Iowa flloding, the major spikes in energy and food prices, the severe droughts in Israel and other countries, and many more.
I think it is time that we, with COEJL in the lead, urged the Jewish community to make tikkun olam a central focus in Jewish life today.
As you know, if we do not overcome the global warming crisis, nothing else will matter.
All the best,
Richard (Comment this)
Thank you for this update and for the wonderful work you do.
frankly, i am glad that they didn't take up the climate change bill, as it was doomed to failure, although it would have at least sent an important signal. i have high hopes for the obama administration and democratic control of both the house and senate.
and, if you look on MY blog, which i am just about to post to, you'll see a joke i once heard. http://sazcoejlsusan.blogspot.com/
there is also a link to the only published page of the new saz coejl web site!
Susan Kaplan, Chair
SAZ COEJL (Comment this)
tornado warning over DC really due to climate change? Are you alleging that G-d created the tornado warning to send a signal to Senators voting the wrong way on the climate? How then would you explain the typhoon
that killed hundreds of Burmese in May? Maybe they were punished for their leaders' wrongdoing. Or the tsunami that killed 100,000? I guess G-d was sending a message - I guess they deserved it! Maybe if they were good Christians or Jews maybe G-d would have spared them, or maybe if their leaders did more on climate change they would all be alive today.
You get my point. I'm a die-hard environmental activist, but I have to say that it makes me more than uncomfortable when anyone claims that G-d is on their side during a debate like climate . . .
best,
TYSON (Comment this)
That is my 2 cents- Hope to continue to see interesting things at your blog-
Dan Pollak (Comment this)
What you say is so true, and resonates with personal frustrations that I have when people respond to natural disasters. You wrote of the tsunami – I was there on the Indian coast when it hit (on which I blogged about it at the 3-year anniversary: http://coejlblog.blog.com/tsunami/). When people heard my story, they said “wow, God protected you.” But I could never say that, because I do not believe that an entity which protected me would let 300,000 people die.
We all agree that we cannot let acts of nature prove a moral point (like homosexuality). We can, however, use acts of nature to talk about science. It is understood that a warming climate – caused by human (in)action – will lead to the types of extreme weather events that Jennifer referred to. The God referred to in this blog is not one that controls nature, but one that let’s nature run its course. In this case, it means that climate change is real, and it is up to us people to change.
(Comment this)