Tuesday, May 13, 2008

High Mercury in Tuna: God’s Spite or Human Fault?

A common line one hears in religious circles is “God works in mysterious ways.”  Is it possible to conclude that when God realized people were going to love eating large, long-lived fishes (which were, after all, created on the 5th day) to the point of oblivion, God actually made us humans pollute the waters so that eating these fish would be toxic to our bodies and we would moderate our consumption?

Probably not. While the notion may be laughable, it does shed light onto the occasional irony that is human induced pollution. While more often pollution and climate change work to endanger and eliminate species from our planet, in this case could our destructiveness save several? 

Some background information: Half of the planet’s atmospheric mercury is human generated, most to produce power that fuels our lives.  As the hunger for sushi has grown and globalization aids all fish exports, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimates that over 70% of the world’s fish species are either fully exploited or depleted. 

The general public is only beginning to learn what pregnant and breast-feeding women (and some others) have known for years: many fishes have mercury, and it is dangerous to eat too much as mercury can get passed along through the placenta and breast milk. 

Though children and fetuses are at the highest risk, because their brains and nervous system are still forming, it has only recently been published that the quantities of mercury in the fishes we eat can be harmful to adults.  The Environmental Defense Fund has a useful report on mercury, from which I excerpt:

“Mercury exposure can also harm adults. Symptoms can include numbness, burning or tingling of the extremities (lips, fingers, toes); fatigue; weakness; irritability; shyness; loss of memory and coordination; tremors; and changes in hearing and blurred vision. Extremely high mercury levels can permanently damage an adult's brain and kidneys, or even lead to circulatory failure.”

Last January, the New York Times broke the story, “High Levels of Mercury Found in Tuna Sushi,” inspired talk, blog posts and more news reports.   Maybe people will be motivated to care for their bodies and eat less mercury heavy, over-fished fish?  Maybe, just maybe, one day our fisheries will be healthy, and eating the fish from them will be healthier, too.

Some Really Great Resources:
My favorite: Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch – a complete guide of all fishes and their health/environmental implications
Environmental Defense Fund’s Guide of “How many meals (of which fish) are safe to eat each month”
Hilarious analysis of the news threads from Newsweek, “Would You Like Mercury With Your Sushi?

 

Posted by Liore at 17:53:53 | Permanent Link | Comments (4) |
Comments
1 - Great blog -- smart and thoughtful as well as good humored (Comment this)

Written by: Anonymous at 2008/05/14 - 03:03:01
2 - Liore,

Pretty soon, people will not have to worry about mercury in their high-end sushi, because bluefin tuna are about to go extinct. I made the point in a January 24 letter to the editor of the New York Times in response to the NYT article you cited:

To the Editor:

Both your Jan. 23 front-page article and your editorial (''Tuna Troubles,'' Jan. 24) regarding the dangers of eating bluefin tuna because of high levels of mercury did not mention (as The Times has done on previous occasions) another, equally compelling reason to avoid consuming the meat of this fish: the bluefin tuna has been so overexploited that the species is on the brink of extinction.

Since the introduction of longline fishing in the 1960's, the Atlantic bluefin population has fallen by 97 percent, and the international bodies responsible for protecting this fishery have, because of its huge profitability, failed to impose catch limits that ensure its survival.

For reasons of both health and environmental responsibility, bluefin tuna should be completely avoided, whether in sushi or any other form.

Gil Kulick
New York, NY
Jan. 24, 2008 (Comment this)

Written by: Anonymous at 2008/05/14 - 22:01:21
profile
3 - Gil,

Your point is very important. The fisheries are generally being over-fished, but bluefin tuna - much because of the increased enjoyment of sushi - are being hit the worst.

When eating sushi, there are other options. You can use the guides mentioned in the blog to find sustainably harvested and low mercury options. (Comment this)

Written by: Liore at 2008/05/14 - 22:19:00
4 - New York Magazine recently ran a story on farm raised bluefin tuna. While I am generally opposed to farm raised fish, this may be an exception (for all the reasons mentioned above). Any thoughts?

http://nymag.com/restaurants/features/46633/

 (Comment this)

Written by: Anonymous at 2008/05/17 - 16:17:42
Write a comment